Connect with us


GTBank MD, Miriam Olusanya, faces trial, risks jail in high-profile case



GTBank MD Miriam Olusanya1 750x375 1

Currently, there’s a tense atmosphere at Guaranty Trust Bank (GTBank) due to the potential legal troubles facing the managing director, Miriam Olusanya. The concern arises from the risk of her facing imprisonment for contempt of court.

Reportedly, Justice A. L. Akintola of the High Court of Oyo state has directed that the bank’s chief executive be put on trial for impeding a customer’s account at the Apata branch in Ibadan. This action was taken based on an order that was seemingly acquired from a magistrates’ court in Kano state.

Olusanya will face trial for contempt of court as a result of an ex-parte motion initiated by Musibau Adetunbi (SAN), the legal representative for the dissatisfied customer of the bank, Omolara Abosede Ogunkoya.

This directive from the court was issued on September 18.

Justice Akintola directed that court documents relating to the contempt proceedings be served on the bank’s MD and its Apata branch’s Manager, Ms. Funmi Olutayo.

Part of the order reads: “Furthermore, by this order, the applicant herein is hereby allowed to serve Form 48 (notice of consequences of disobedience to order of this honourable court made on the 7th day of September 2023 and Form 49 (notice to show cause why the order of attachment should not be made and other subsequence processes in these contempt proceedings on the Managing Director of Guaranty Trust Bank Pic, Miriam Olusanya by substituted means to wit; by pasting the said processes on the wall of, Guaranty Trust Bank Pic, Apata branch/business office, Ibadan Oyo state.”

The contempt case was informed by the bank’s alleged refusal to obey the court’s orders contained in a judgment delivered on September 7 directing it to, among others, immediately lift the restriction it placed on Mrs. Ogunkoya’s account.

The bank customer had sued the bank following its alleged refusal to lift the restriction it placed on her account without allegedly offering any reason for its action.

In the fundamental rights enforcement suit, marked M/696/2023, Mrs. Ogunkoya said she had operated the account without hindrance until the bank suddenly placed a lien on it earlier this year.

She added that her efforts to make the bank rethink or provide a reason for its action proved abortive, prompting her to sue.

Delivering judgment on the suit on September 7, Justice Akintola found, among others, that the bank’s action was unjustified, noting that the order on which the bank relied to act was doubtful.

The judge said: “It is doubtful if the enrolled order of the Kano Chief Magistrate Court, attached as Exhibit B to the respondent’s (the bank’s) counter affidavit, is a certified true copy of such an order.
“To the extent that it purports to be a public document, but which is not certified as a true copy of the original, this court cannot take cognizance of same.

“In the end result, the basis upon which the respondent (GTBank) has placed the lien or embargo on the applicant’s account maintained with the respondent is of doubtful validity, and same cannot be recognized or given any effect to by this court.

“It is on this premise that this court finds merit in the applicant’s application, and the same accordingly succeeds. It is, consequently, hereby ordered as prayed.”

Justice Akintola ordered the bank to lift the restriction on the account immediately, orders the bank has failed to comply with.

Source:- ThePressNG

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *